Understanding plumbing systems necessitates evaluating different connection methods, where PEX tubing stands out as a prevalent option. Manufacturers such as Apollo and SharkBite offer competing PEX fitting solutions, each presenting unique advantages and disadvantages for plumbers and homeowners. Installation costs represent a significant factor when choosing between Apollo vs SharkBite PEX, alongside long-term reliability, code compliance, and overall performance. This detailed analysis explores the differences between apollo vs sharkbite pex to provide comprehensive guidance on selecting the best system for your needs.

Image taken from the YouTube channel SharkBite Plumbing , from the video titled 4 Fitting Systems for SharkBite PEX Pipe .
In the world of modern plumbing, Polyethylene Cross-linked, or PEX, has emerged as a frontrunner, challenging the long-standing dominance of traditional materials like copper and galvanized steel.
Among the various PEX systems available, Apollo PEX and SharkBite PEX stand out as two of the most popular choices for both professional plumbers and DIY enthusiasts.
This article dives deep into a comparative analysis of these two titans of PEX plumbing.
Our aim is to provide a comprehensive assessment, weighing their strengths and weaknesses across key factors to ultimately crown a champion.
The Rise of PEX Plumbing
PEX tubing has revolutionized the plumbing industry.
Its flexibility, durability, and cost-effectiveness have made it an increasingly attractive alternative to traditional materials.
Unlike rigid copper pipes, PEX can bend and flex around obstacles, reducing the number of fittings required and simplifying installation, especially in complex layouts.
This adaptability translates to faster project completion and lower overall costs.
Apollo PEX and SharkBite PEX: Two Modern Plumbing Options
Apollo PEX and SharkBite PEX both offer modern solutions to traditional plumbing challenges.
Each system boasts its unique advantages, appealing to different users and project requirements.
Apollo PEX is known for its reliable connections using crimp or expansion fittings, often favored by professionals for its long-term performance and cost-effectiveness.
SharkBite PEX, on the other hand, champions ease of use with its push-to-connect fittings. This tool-free connection method makes it a popular choice for DIYers and quick repairs.
Objective: A Head-to-Head Comparison
This article provides a structured, side-by-side comparison of Apollo PEX and SharkBite PEX.
We will analyze critical aspects such as:
- Cost: Evaluating material expenses for typical plumbing projects.
- Installation: Assessing ease, complexity, required tools, and skill levels.
- Durability: Examining long-term performance, resistance to leaks, and potential for bursting.
- Reliability: Investigating overall performance under standard operating conditions.
Our goal is to equip you with the knowledge necessary to make an informed decision for your specific plumbing needs.
Relevance for Homeowners and Plumbers
Whether you’re a homeowner contemplating a DIY plumbing project or a professional plumber seeking the best solutions for your clients, this comparison is for you.
Understanding the nuances of Apollo PEX and SharkBite PEX can save you time, money, and potential headaches down the road.
By carefully evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of each system, you can select the ideal option that aligns with your skill level, project requirements, and budget.
Apollo PEX and SharkBite PEX offer distinct advantages for various plumbing needs. Understanding the fundamental principles of PEX plumbing is crucial before diving into a comparative analysis. Let’s explore the basics of PEX tubing, its benefits, fitting types, and essential installation methods.
PEX Plumbing Demystified: Understanding the Basics
PEX, or cross-linked polyethylene, has become a staple in modern plumbing due to its unique properties and advantages. It’s a type of plastic tubing that has undergone a cross-linking process, enhancing its durability and resistance to high temperatures and pressures.
What is PEX Tubing?
Cross-linking modifies the polyethylene structure, creating bonds between polymer chains. This gives PEX exceptional flexibility, making it easier to maneuver around obstacles without the need for numerous fittings.
Unlike traditional rigid pipes, PEX can bend, reducing potential leak points and simplifying installation, especially in confined spaces. The cross-linking process also improves the material’s resistance to chemicals and corrosion.
Key Advantages of PEX Plumbing
PEX tubing offers several compelling benefits over traditional materials like copper or galvanized steel:
-
Flexibility: Bends easily, reducing the need for fittings.
-
Cost-Effectiveness: Generally less expensive than copper.
-
Durability: Resistant to corrosion and high temperatures.
-
Ease of Installation: Simpler installation methods compared to traditional piping.
-
Reduced Noise: Dampens water flow noise more effectively than rigid pipes.
These advantages have contributed to the widespread adoption of PEX in residential and commercial plumbing applications.
Types of PEX Fittings and Their Functions
PEX systems rely on various fittings to connect tubing and create a complete plumbing network. These fittings come in different materials and connection types, each suited for specific applications.
Common types of PEX fittings include:
-
Crimp Fittings: These fittings use a copper or stainless steel ring that is crimped onto the PEX tubing using a specialized tool to create a secure connection.
-
Expansion Fittings: These fittings use a tool to expand the PEX tubing before inserting a fitting, then the tubing shrinks back to create a tight seal.
-
Push-to-Connect Fittings: These fittings allow for quick and easy connections without special tools by simply pushing the tubing into the fitting.
Each fitting type has its advantages and disadvantages in terms of cost, ease of installation, and long-term reliability.
Installation Methods: Crimp, Expansion, and Push-to-Connect
Installing PEX tubing involves specific methods depending on the type of fitting used. The most common methods are crimp, expansion, and push-to-connect.
-
Crimp Method: Requires a crimp tool to secure the crimp ring over the PEX tubing and fitting. Ensures a robust connection.
-
Expansion Method: Utilizes an expansion tool to enlarge the PEX tubing before inserting the fitting. Provides a very strong, permanent connection.
-
Push-to-Connect Method: Involves simply pushing the PEX tubing into the fitting until it locks in place. Offers the fastest and easiest installation, but may be more expensive per fitting.
Proper installation is crucial for preventing leaks and ensuring the long-term performance of the PEX plumbing system. Regardless of the method used, following the manufacturer’s instructions is paramount.
Apollo PEX: An In-Depth Exploration
Having established a foundation in PEX plumbing, it’s time to delve into specific PEX solutions. We’ll begin by examining Apollo PEX, a widely used system known for its blend of affordability and reliability. Let’s dissect its components, installation nuances, benefits, and potential downsides to provide a comprehensive understanding.
Apollo PEX Systems: A Comprehensive Overview
Apollo PEX offers a variety of tubing and fitting options to suit diverse plumbing needs. Their PEX tubing is available in types A, B, and C, each possessing unique characteristics in terms of flexibility and chlorine resistance.
Apollo PEX-A stands out due to its superior flexibility, which simplifies installation, particularly in colder climates.
The fitting selection includes crimp fittings, expansion fittings, and push-to-connect fittings, providing plumbers and DIYers with choices based on their preferences and project requirements.
The availability of multiple types of tubing and fitting options means that Apollo PEX can fit the needs of most projects, from simple residential repairs to large-scale commercial installations.
Apollo PEX Installation: Tools and Techniques
Installing Apollo PEX typically involves either the crimp or expansion method. The choice often depends on the installer’s experience and the specific requirements of the project.
Crimp connections, a popular choice, require a PEX crimp tool, crimp rings (typically copper), and a go/no-go gauge to ensure proper crimp completion.
The process involves sliding the crimp ring over the tubing, inserting the fitting, and then using the crimp tool to compress the ring, creating a secure connection.
Expansion connections, typically used with PEX-A tubing, require an expansion tool to expand the tubing before inserting the fitting.
Upon insertion, the tubing gradually shrinks back to its original size, creating a tight, leak-proof seal.
While both methods are effective, proper technique is crucial to prevent leaks.
Advantages of Apollo PEX
One of the most compelling advantages of Apollo PEX is its cost-effectiveness. Compared to copper piping, Apollo PEX offers significant savings on material costs, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious homeowners and contractors.
Furthermore, Apollo PEX is known for its reliability. When installed correctly, Apollo PEX systems provide years of dependable service with minimal maintenance.
The material’s resistance to corrosion and scaling ensures long-term performance, contributing to its overall value.
The flexibility of PEX tubing also reduces the number of fittings required, minimizing potential leak points and further enhancing reliability.
Potential Issues and Limitations
Despite its numerous benefits, Apollo PEX is not without its potential drawbacks. One common concern is the potential for leaks if crimp or expansion connections are not properly executed.
It’s crucial to use the correct tools and follow the manufacturer’s instructions meticulously to avoid such issues.
Some users have also reported that certain types of PEX fittings can be prone to corrosion in specific water conditions, although this is not a widespread issue.
It’s essential to consider water quality and choose appropriate fittings to mitigate this risk.
Additionally, while PEX is generally durable, it’s susceptible to damage from UV exposure, so it should be shielded from direct sunlight.
Having explored the intricacies of Apollo PEX, let’s now shift our focus to another prominent player in the PEX plumbing arena: SharkBite PEX. Renowned for its innovative push-to-connect fittings, SharkBite offers a compelling alternative with its promise of rapid and straightforward installations. We will examine its system components, installation techniques, advantages, and potential disadvantages.
SharkBite PEX: A Closer Look
SharkBite PEX has carved a niche in the plumbing world, largely due to its user-friendly approach. The system distinguishes itself with its push-to-connect fittings, which eliminate the need for specialized tools in many applications. This emphasis on simplicity has made it a popular choice, especially for DIY enthusiasts and quick repair jobs.
Understanding the SharkBite PEX System
At its core, the SharkBite PEX system revolves around its proprietary fittings. These fittings utilize a stainless steel grab ring that grips the PEX tubing when it’s pushed into the fitting. An O-ring then creates a watertight seal.
This design allows for quick connections without crimping, expansion, or soldering.
SharkBite also offers PEX tubing, though it’s important to note that their fittings are compatible with PEX tubing conforming to industry standards (ASTM F876). This means you can generally use SharkBite fittings with PEX tubing from other manufacturers, provided it meets the necessary specifications.
Installation: Simplicity Redefined
The hallmark of SharkBite PEX is its ease of installation. The push-to-connect design translates to a tool-free experience for many connections.
The process is straightforward:
- Cut the PEX tubing squarely.
- Ensure the tubing is free of burrs.
- Simply push the tubing into the SharkBite fitting until it reaches the stop.
Disconnection is equally simple, requiring a disconnection clip or tool to release the grab ring. This ease of use makes SharkBite a compelling option for repairs and modifications where speed and convenience are paramount.
Advantages: Speed and Convenience
SharkBite PEX shines in situations where time is of the essence. The rapid installation offered by push-to-connect fittings can significantly reduce project time, particularly in emergency repairs.
This is a significant advantage for DIYers who may lack experience with traditional plumbing methods. The convenience factor also extends to tight spaces where maneuvering crimp or expansion tools might be difficult or impossible.
Limitations: Cost and Potential Concerns
While SharkBite offers clear advantages in terms of speed and convenience, it’s crucial to acknowledge its limitations. The most prominent drawback is the higher cost per fitting compared to crimp or expansion fittings.
For large-scale projects, this can translate to a substantial increase in material expenses.
Furthermore, while SharkBite fittings are generally reliable, some concerns have been raised regarding their long-term durability and potential for leaks. These concerns often stem from improper installation, such as failing to fully insert the tubing or using damaged fittings.
It’s critical to follow the manufacturer’s instructions meticulously to ensure a secure and leak-free connection. Despite being tool-free to connect, a deburring tool is required to remove the burrs to guarantee a tight seal, ensuring a good connection. Also, ensure the pipe is cut squarely so that the pipe fully seats into the fitting.
Having explored the individual strengths and weaknesses of Apollo PEX and SharkBite PEX, it’s time to pit them against each other in a head-to-head comparison. This ultimate showdown will delve into the critical factors that influence a homeowner’s or plumber’s choice, including cost, ease of installation, durability, and overall reliability. Let’s see which PEX system emerges victorious.
Apollo vs. SharkBite: The Ultimate Showdown
Selecting the right PEX system involves a careful evaluation of several key factors. This section provides a direct comparison of Apollo PEX and SharkBite PEX across these crucial areas.
Cost: A Balancing Act
The initial investment is a significant consideration for any plumbing project. When comparing Apollo PEX and SharkBite PEX, cost differences quickly become apparent.
Apollo PEX generally offers a lower material cost, especially when considering larger projects. This is primarily due to the more affordable fittings and the ability to make numerous connections with a relatively inexpensive crimping tool.
SharkBite PEX, on the other hand, carries a higher cost per fitting. While the convenience of push-to-connect fittings is attractive, the price can add up quickly, especially in extensive plumbing systems.
For smaller repairs or single connections, the cost difference may be negligible. However, for whole-house repiping or new construction, the savings associated with Apollo PEX can be substantial.
Installation: Simplicity vs. Tool Investment
The ease of installation is a major differentiating factor between these two PEX systems. Apollo PEX requires an investment in specialized tools, while SharkBite PEX aims for tool-free simplicity.
Apollo PEX relies on either crimp or expansion tools to create secure connections. While these tools require some initial investment and a learning curve, the process becomes efficient with practice. Correct crimping or expansion is crucial for a reliable seal.
SharkBite PEX shines in its ease of use. The push-to-connect fittings eliminate the need for specialized tools in most situations. This makes it an excellent choice for DIY enthusiasts and quick repairs where speed and convenience are paramount.
However, even with SharkBite, certain situations, like disconnecting fittings, may require a special disconnect clip.
The choice between the two depends on the user’s skill level, willingness to invest in tools, and the scale of the project.
Durability: Long-Term Performance
The longevity and resistance to failure are critical aspects of any plumbing system. Both Apollo PEX and SharkBite PEX, when properly installed, offer excellent durability.
Apollo PEX, with its mechanically sound crimp or expansion connections, provides a robust and reliable seal that can withstand high pressures and temperature fluctuations. The key is proper installation following specified procedures.
SharkBite PEX fittings are also designed for long-term performance. Their stainless steel grab ring and O-ring create a watertight seal that resists corrosion and degradation over time.
However, some users express concern about the long-term reliability of O-ring seals compared to the mechanical strength of crimped or expanded connections. Independent testing and adherence to installation guidelines are essential for both systems to ensure durability.
Reliability: Performance Under Pressure
Reliability encompasses the overall performance of the plumbing system under normal operating conditions. Both Apollo PEX and SharkBite PEX have proven track records of providing reliable water distribution.
Apollo PEX, when installed correctly, delivers consistent performance with minimal risk of leaks or failures. Regular inspections and pressure testing can further ensure the system’s integrity.
SharkBite PEX offers reliability through its ease of use and consistent connection method. The visual confirmation of a proper connection provides added assurance during installation.
However, the push-to-connect design may be more susceptible to damage if the tubing is not cut squarely or if debris interferes with the sealing surfaces.
Addressing Leakage Concerns
Leakage is a primary concern in any plumbing installation. Both Apollo PEX and SharkBite PEX are susceptible to leaks if not installed correctly.
With Apollo PEX, improper crimping or expansion can lead to leaks. Using the correct tools, following manufacturer’s instructions, and performing pressure tests are vital to prevent this.
SharkBite PEX leaks typically arise from improper insertion of the tubing or damage to the O-ring. Ensuring the tubing is cut squarely, deburred, and fully inserted into the fitting is crucial.
The Role of Professional Plumbers
While both systems are DIY-friendly to varying degrees, the expertise of professional plumbers can significantly impact the reliability of the installation.
Professional plumbers possess the knowledge and experience to select the appropriate PEX system for a specific application, ensure proper installation techniques, and identify potential problems before they arise.
Their familiarity with local plumbing codes and regulations also guarantees compliance and safety. Even with user-friendly systems like SharkBite, complex plumbing projects are best left to the professionals.
In conclusion, both Apollo PEX and SharkBite PEX offer viable solutions for modern plumbing needs. The "best" choice depends on factors like project size, budget, DIY aptitude, and long-term reliability expectations.
Having carefully dissected the strengths and weaknesses of both Apollo PEX and SharkBite PEX across critical categories, it’s time to render a verdict. The data has been presented, the arguments weighed, and now, the moment of truth arrives.
The Verdict: And the PEX Champion Is…
Determining a definitive "winner" in the Apollo PEX vs. SharkBite PEX debate isn’t as straightforward as declaring a knockout in a boxing match. The optimal choice hinges significantly on the specific project scope, budget constraints, and the installer’s comfort level and expertise.
That being said, based on our comprehensive comparison, a champion emerges – albeit with certain caveats.
The Crown Goes To… Apollo PEX (With Reservations)
For overall versatility, cost-effectiveness, and long-term reliability in the majority of plumbing applications, Apollo PEX narrowly edges out SharkBite PEX as the preferred choice.
This decision is primarily driven by Apollo PEX’s lower material costs, particularly when dealing with larger, more complex plumbing systems. The ability to create numerous connections with relatively inexpensive fittings and a one-time investment in a crimping or expansion tool translates to substantial savings over time.
Reasoning and Evidence
Consider a scenario involving a whole-house repiping project. The sheer volume of connections required would make SharkBite fittings prohibitively expensive.
For example, a typical three-bedroom house might require hundreds of connections. At an average cost of \$3-5 per SharkBite fitting compared to less than \$1 for an Apollo PEX fitting, the cost difference could easily reach thousands of dollars.
Furthermore, while the initial investment in tools for Apollo PEX might seem daunting, these tools are durable and can be used for countless projects over the years.
On the reliability front, properly installed Apollo PEX connections have a proven track record of longevity and resistance to leaks and bursts. While SharkBite connections are generally reliable when installed correctly, the push-to-connect design introduces an additional point of potential failure compared to the mechanically secure crimped or expanded Apollo PEX connection.
The Context Matters: SharkBite’s Niche
It’s crucial to emphasize that Apollo PEX’s victory is not absolute. SharkBite PEX excels in specific situations, particularly small repairs, emergency fixes, or projects where speed and convenience are paramount.
The tool-free installation of SharkBite fittings makes them ideal for DIYers tackling minor plumbing tasks or for plumbers needing a quick solution in tight spaces. In these scenarios, the higher cost per fitting is often offset by the time and labor saved.
Consider a situation where a homeowner needs to repair a leaking pipe under a sink. A SharkBite fitting can be installed in a matter of seconds without the need for specialized tools or extensive plumbing knowledge.
The Professional’s Perspective
While DIY projects often lean towards SharkBite for simplicity, professional plumbers frequently favor Apollo PEX for its cost-effectiveness and long-term reliability in larger projects. Their experience with crimping and expansion tools, coupled with their understanding of plumbing codes and best practices, allows them to efficiently install Apollo PEX systems with confidence.
Moreover, professionals often appreciate the greater degree of control and precision offered by crimp and expansion methods, ensuring a secure and leak-free connection that meets stringent industry standards. The lower material costs also allow them to offer competitive bids on larger plumbing jobs, attracting more clients.
Ultimately, the choice between Apollo PEX and SharkBite PEX is a matter of weighing the pros and cons in the context of the specific project and the installer’s capabilities. There’s no one-size-fits-all answer, but hopefully, this analysis has provided the information needed to make an informed decision.
Apollo vs SharkBite PEX: FAQs
This section answers common questions about the Apollo vs SharkBite PEX comparison, clarifying the key differences and the surprising outcome.
Which PEX fitting is generally considered more cost-effective upfront?
Apollo PEX fittings typically have a lower initial cost compared to SharkBite PEX fittings. This is often a deciding factor for budget-conscious projects involving apollo vs sharkbite pex.
What makes SharkBite PEX fittings so much easier to install?
SharkBite fittings utilize a push-to-connect design. This allows for tool-free installation. You simply push the PEX pipe into the fitting until it clicks. This is a major advantage over the tools required for Apollo vs sharkbite pex fitting installation.
What are the primary concerns about the long-term reliability of push-to-connect fittings like SharkBite?
While convenient, some plumbers worry about the potential for O-ring degradation over time in push-to-connect fittings, leading to leaks. Proper installation and water quality are critical for long-term performance when using SharkBite PEX.
In terms of overall value, considering both cost and ease of use, which PEX fitting often wins out for DIYers?
For DIYers, SharkBite PEX fittings can be the more practical choice. The speed and simplicity of installation often outweigh the higher upfront cost and any potential long-term concerns. However, Apollo vs sharkbite pex fittings still require the right tools.
So there you have it! Hopefully, this deep dive into apollo vs sharkbite pex helps you make the best decision for your next plumbing project. Happy plumbing!